Maze alternatives
10 other tools do this job. Which one is right depends on why Maze is not working for you — so start from the reason, not the list.
Why teams leave Maze
- Unmoderated only — you cannot ask a follow-up question.
- Prototype testing measures a happy path, not the messy reality of a live product.
- Bring-your-own-participants works well; the built-in panel is smaller than UserTesting's.
Worth saying: Maze is genuinely strong at this — test a figma prototype with real users before building anything. If that is the part you rely on, switching may cost more than it saves.
If cost is the problem
Cheaper than Maze at the entry point, or free outright.
Lyssna
User Research
Fast, affordable design testing: five-second tests, first-click, preference, surveys.
Useberry
User Research
Prototype and live-site testing with heatmaps and clear flow analytics.
Prolific
User Research
High-quality participant recruitment for surveys and studies, originally from academia.
User Interviews
User Research
Recruitment marketplace: find and pay participants, bring your own research method.
Everything else in User Research
Ranked by how widely adopted they are. Compare any two to see the differences that matter.
Fast, affordable design testing: five-second tests, first-click, preference, surveys.
The largest participant network for moderated and unmoderated usability studies.
Information-architecture research: card sorting, tree testing, first-click.
High-quality participant recruitment for surveys and studies, originally from academia.
Recruitment marketplace: find and pay participants, bring your own research method.
Research repository: store, tag and search every interview your organisation has run.
Moderated and unmoderated testing with a global panel and flexible pricing.
End-to-end research operations: recruit, schedule, run, analyse, share.
Not sure which of these fits?
Answer six questions about your stack, team and budget and we will narrow it down for you.
Run the stack finder