Autify vs Tricentis Tosca

Quote on request

Quote on request

Quote-based annual contracts sized by test runs.

Enterprise licensing only, negotiated annually. Six-figure contracts are normal at scale.

Two-week free trial.

Emerging

Autify, Inc. · since 2016

Widely used

Tricentis · since 2007

• Very low barrier to a first working suite — recording plus a managed browser cloud.
• Maintenance burden is genuinely reduced by the self-healing model.
• Covers web and native mobile from one vendor.

• Unmatched coverage of enterprise packaged software, especially SAP end-to-end processes.
• Model-based design means one change updates every affected test case.
• Risk-based prioritisation is a real answer to eight-hour regression packs.

• No self-hosted option.
• Limited support for complex data-driven scenarios.
• Smaller international presence and support footprint than the US vendors.

• Expensive, and priced for organisations with a procurement department.
• Steep learning curve; most customers buy consulting alongside the licence.
• Heavy and slow compared to modern code-first tools for plain web applications.

Small QA teams that need automation without an engineering hire.

Large enterprises running SAP or similar packaged systems where no open-source tool reaches.