Checkmarx One vs Invicti

Quote on request

Quote on request

Enterprise annual licensing, typically by developer count or lines of code. Six figures at scale.

Enterprise licensing by number of target sites or applications.

Free trial.

Demo and trial on request.

Widely used

Checkmarx · since 2006

Established

Invicti Security · since 2009

• Very deep SAST analysis with wide language coverage including legacy enterprise languages.
• One platform and one risk view across every scan type.
• Strong compliance and audit reporting.

• Proof-based scanning eliminates most false-positive triage, which is the main cost of DAST.
• Handles authenticated scanning of modern JavaScript applications well.
• Good asset discovery for organisations that do not know all their own sites.

• Expensive, with a long procurement and deployment cycle.
• High false-positive volume typical of deep SAST; tuning is a project.
• Scans are slow relative to developer-first tools.

• Expensive relative to free DAST alternatives.
• Scans take time and are not suited to per-commit feedback.
• Dynamic testing alone cannot find everything a code review would.

Large enterprises with a security function and regulatory obligations.

Organisations with many web applications and no capacity to triage scanner noise.