Invicti vs Mend.io

Quote on request

Quote on request

Enterprise licensing by number of target sites or applications.

Quote-based enterprise pricing, typically per developer or per application.

Demo and trial on request.

Free tier for small teams on Mend's developer products.

Established

Invicti Security · since 2009

Widely used

Mend.io · since 2011

• Proof-based scanning eliminates most false-positive triage, which is the main cost of DAST.
• Handles authenticated scanning of modern JavaScript applications well.
• Good asset discovery for organisations that do not know all their own sites.

• Licence compliance reporting is the strongest in the category and often the reason legal approves a release.
• Reachability analysis reduces the transitive-dependency alert flood.
• Automated remediation pull requests.

• Expensive relative to free DAST alternatives.
• Scans take time and are not suited to per-commit feedback.
• Dynamic testing alone cannot find everything a code review would.

• SAST is weaker than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Enterprise pricing and sales process.
• Interface is dated in places.

Organisations with many web applications and no capacity to triage scanner noise.

Enterprises where open-source licence compliance is as important as vulnerability management.