Invicti vs Snyk

Quote on request

From $25 per contributing developer/month (indicative, Team)

Enterprise licensing by number of target sites or applications.

Priced per contributing developer. Enterprise agreements add reporting and governance and get expensive.

Demo and trial on request.

Free plan with a monthly test allowance, generous enough for small projects.

Established

Invicti Security · since 2009

Category standard

Snyk · since 2015

• Proof-based scanning eliminates most false-positive triage, which is the main cost of DAST.
• Handles authenticated scanning of modern JavaScript applications well.
• Good asset discovery for organisations that do not know all their own sites.

• Reachability analysis dramatically cuts the noise from transitive dependency alerts.
• Automated fix pull requests make remediation a merge rather than a project.
• One vendor covers dependencies, code, containers and IaC.

• Expensive relative to free DAST alternatives.
• Scans take time and are not suited to per-commit feedback.
• Dynamic testing alone cannot find everything a code review would.

• Per-developer pricing scales uncomfortably in large engineering organisations.
• SAST is less deep than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Still produces substantial alert volume on older codebases.

Organisations with many web applications and no capacity to triage scanner noise.

Engineering teams that want security findings arriving in the pull request with a fix attached.