Leapwork vs QA Wolf

Quote on request

Quote on request

Enterprise quote-based licensing, typically annual and sized by concurrent runners plus authoring seats.

Annual service contracts. Substantially cheaper than hiring an in-house automation team, substantially more expensive than a tool licence.

Free trial.

Emerging

Leapwork · since 2015

Emerging

QA Wolf · since 2019

• Genuinely usable by non-technical staff — the flowchart model is easier than any script-behind-a-recorder approach.
• Covers Citrix, virtual desktop and mainframe environments that most tools cannot touch.
• Doubles as an RPA platform, which can consolidate two budgets.

• Removes the maintenance burden entirely — no flaky-test triage on your side.
• You own the Playwright code, so leaving is possible.
• Coverage arrives in weeks rather than quarters.

• Flowcharts do not diff or merge, so version control is essentially unusable.
• Complex logic becomes an unreadable sprawl of blocks.
• Enterprise pricing with no small-team entry point.

• It is headcount, not software — the cost profile is completely different from a licence.
• External team needs deep product context to test meaningfully.
• Fast-moving products can outpace the feedback loop with an external author.

Enterprises where business users must own automation and Citrix or mainframe is in scope.

Funded startups that need coverage now and have no QA hire in the plan.