mabl vs Autify

Quote on request

Quote on request

Quote-based, typically sold as an annual contract sized by test runs and users. Expect mid five figures for a team deployment.

Quote-based annual contracts sized by test runs.

14-day free trial.

Two-week free trial.

Established

mabl · since 2018

Emerging

Autify, Inc. · since 2016

• Self-healing genuinely reduces maintenance on UIs that change often.
• Auto-captured visual, performance and accessibility signals on every run without extra setup.
• Very little infrastructure to own — no grid, no runners.

• Very low barrier to a first working suite — recording plus a managed browser cloud.
• Maintenance burden is genuinely reduced by the self-healing model.
• Covers web and native mobile from one vendor.

• Cloud-only. If your application is not reachable from mabl's infrastructure, the setup gets complicated.
• Complex conditional logic hits the ceiling of the low-code model.
• Opaque pricing and a substantial minimum commitment.

• No self-hosted option.
• Limited support for complex data-driven scenarios.
• Smaller international presence and support footprint than the US vendors.

Mid-market teams that want broad automated coverage without hiring an automation team.

Small QA teams that need automation without an engineering hire.