Maze vs Useberry

From $99 per month (indicative, Starter)

From $67 per month (indicative)

Panel recruitment is billed separately from the platform subscription.

Cheaper than Maze at comparable functionality; participant recruitment is separate.

Free plan with a limited number of studies and responses per month.

Free plan with limited tests and responses.

Widely used

Maze · since 2018

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

• Test a Figma prototype with real users before building anything.
• Quantitative metrics make results defensible in a product review.
• Usable free tier for evaluation and small studies.

• Good value — most of Maze's capability at a lower price.
• Supports a wide range of prototype sources.
• Card sorting and tree testing included rather than sold separately.

• Unmoderated only — you cannot ask a follow-up question.
• Prototype testing measures a happy path, not the messy reality of a live product.
• Bring-your-own-participants works well; the built-in panel is smaller than UserTesting's.

• Smaller company with a lighter integration ecosystem.
• No moderated research.
• Limited built-in panel.

Product and design teams validating flows early and often.

Small teams that want prototype testing without enterprise pricing.