Mend.io vs Invicti

Quote on request

Quote on request

Quote-based enterprise pricing, typically per developer or per application.

Enterprise licensing by number of target sites or applications.

Free tier for small teams on Mend's developer products.

Demo and trial on request.

Widely used

Mend.io · since 2011

Established

Invicti Security · since 2009

• Licence compliance reporting is the strongest in the category and often the reason legal approves a release.
• Reachability analysis reduces the transitive-dependency alert flood.
• Automated remediation pull requests.

• Proof-based scanning eliminates most false-positive triage, which is the main cost of DAST.
• Handles authenticated scanning of modern JavaScript applications well.
• Good asset discovery for organisations that do not know all their own sites.

• SAST is weaker than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Enterprise pricing and sales process.
• Interface is dated in places.

• Expensive relative to free DAST alternatives.
• Scans take time and are not suited to per-commit feedback.
• Dynamic testing alone cannot find everything a code review would.

Enterprises where open-source licence compliance is as important as vulnerability management.

Organisations with many web applications and no capacity to triage scanner noise.