Mend.io vs Veracode

Quote on request

Quote on request

Quote-based enterprise pricing, typically per developer or per application.

Enterprise annual subscriptions priced by application count and scan types.

Free tier for small teams on Mend's developer products.

No free tier.

Widely used

Mend.io · since 2011

Widely used

Veracode · since 2006

• Licence compliance reporting is the strongest in the category and often the reason legal approves a release.
• Reachability analysis reduces the transitive-dependency alert flood.
• Automated remediation pull requests.

• Binary scanning works on third-party and supplier software where source is unavailable.
• Policy engine and attestation reports satisfy regulated procurement directly.
• Managed service model suits organisations without a security engineering team.

• SAST is weaker than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Enterprise pricing and sales process.
• Interface is dated in places.

• Slow feedback compared with developer-first tools — poor fit for per-commit scanning.
• Expensive per application.
• Developer experience lags Snyk and Semgrep considerably.

Enterprises where open-source licence compliance is as important as vulnerability management.

Regulated enterprises needing formal security attestation, including for supplier software.