NUnit vs unittest

Free and open source

Free and open source

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Everything, self-hosted

Everything, self-hosted

Widely used

.NET Foundation · since 2002

Widely used

Python Software Foundation · since 2001

• The most expressive built-in assertion library in .NET.
• Familiar attribute model for teams migrating from older frameworks.
• Very stable, very long-lived.

• In the standard library — nothing to install or vet.
• unittest.mock is excellent and used almost universally in Python.
• Familiar to anyone coming from JUnit or NUnit.

• Shared test-class instances mean state can leak between tests unless you are careful.
• New Microsoft templates default to xUnit, so it is drifting from the mainstream.
• Attribute-heavy style feels dated.

• Verbose compared to pytest for the same coverage.
• No parametrisation or fixture composition worth the name.
• Most teams run unittest tests through pytest anyway.

Existing .NET codebases already standardised on NUnit.

Standard-library-only environments and codebases that already use it.