pytest vs Vitest

Free and open source

Free and open source

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Everything, self-hosted

Everything, self-hosted

Category standard

pytest-dev · since 2004

Category standard

VoidZero / OSS community · since 2021

• Fixtures are the best dependency-injection model in any test framework, and they compose cleanly.
• Assertion introspection produces genuinely useful failure output from a plain assert.
• Vast plugin ecosystem — pytest-xdist, pytest-cov, pytest-asyncio, pytest-django.

• Fastest watch-mode feedback of the JavaScript runners, by a wide margin on large repos.
• Zero-config ESM and TypeScript — the single biggest source of Jest configuration pain simply disappears.
• Jest-compatible API means migration is usually a day, not a quarter.

• Fixture scope and ordering become genuinely hard to reason about in large suites.
• The magic that makes simple cases elegant makes complex cases opaque.
• Python only.

• Assumes Vite. On a Webpack or Metro project the advantage largely evaporates.
• Younger ecosystem; a handful of niche Jest plugins have no equivalent.
• Browser mode is still maturing relative to a dedicated component test runner.

Essentially every Python project.

Any Vite-based project, and most new JavaScript projects generally.