Rainforest QA vs Cypress

Quote on request

From $75 per month (Cloud, entry team plan)

Quote-based. Human-executed runs are billed separately from automated ones and are the expensive component.

You only pay for Cypress Cloud. Costs scale with recorded test results, so a large suite on every PR is the expensive shape.

Free tier for a small number of automated tests.

The test runner is free forever. Cypress Cloud free tier covers a limited number of recorded test results per month.

Emerging

Rainforest QA · since 2012

Category standard

Cypress.io · since 2017

• The human fallback covers scenarios automation genuinely cannot reach.
• Anyone on the team can author a test.
• Results in minutes, integrated into the deployment pipeline.

• The interactive runner is the best onboarding experience in E2E testing; a new developer writes a passing test in minutes.
• Excellent documentation and one of the largest plugin ecosystems.
• Component testing and E2E in one tool with one config.

• Human runs get expensive quickly at any real frequency.
• Human testers lack product context, so results need interpretation.
• Web only.

• Runs in the same event loop as your app, which historically meant no multi-tab, multi-origin or iframe-heavy testing without workarounds. Support has improved but the model still constrains you.
• JavaScript and TypeScript only.
• Meaningful parallelisation effectively requires paying for Cypress Cloud.

Teams that need broad release-gate coverage including flows nobody wants to automate.

Front-end teams who value developer experience and live in a single-origin JavaScript app.