Respondent vs Useberry

From $39 per participant (indicative fee, plus incentive)

From $67 per month (indicative)

B2B incentives are high — $100-$400 per professional participant is normal, on top of the platform fee.

Cheaper than Maze at comparable functionality; participant recruitment is separate.

No subscription required; pay per completed session.

Free plan with limited tests and responses.

Established

Respondent · since 2016

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

• Reaches professional segments that general panels simply do not contain.
• Verification meaningfully reduces participants misrepresenting their role.
• No subscription commitment.

• Good value — most of Maze's capability at a lower price.
• Supports a wide range of prototype sources.
• Card sorting and tree testing included rather than sold separately.

• Expensive per participant once incentives are included.
• Recruitment only, no research tooling.
• Some fraudulent participation persists despite verification.

• Smaller company with a lighter integration ecosystem.
• No moderated research.
• Limited built-in panel.

B2B product teams that need to talk to specific professional roles.

Small teams that want prototype testing without enterprise pricing.