Snyk vs Invicti

From $25 per contributing developer/month (indicative, Team)

Quote on request

Priced per contributing developer. Enterprise agreements add reporting and governance and get expensive.

Enterprise licensing by number of target sites or applications.

Free plan with a monthly test allowance, generous enough for small projects.

Demo and trial on request.

Category standard

Snyk · since 2015

Established

Invicti Security · since 2009

• Reachability analysis dramatically cuts the noise from transitive dependency alerts.
• Automated fix pull requests make remediation a merge rather than a project.
• One vendor covers dependencies, code, containers and IaC.

• Proof-based scanning eliminates most false-positive triage, which is the main cost of DAST.
• Handles authenticated scanning of modern JavaScript applications well.
• Good asset discovery for organisations that do not know all their own sites.

• Per-developer pricing scales uncomfortably in large engineering organisations.
• SAST is less deep than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Still produces substantial alert volume on older codebases.

• Expensive relative to free DAST alternatives.
• Scans take time and are not suited to per-commit feedback.
• Dynamic testing alone cannot find everything a code review would.

Engineering teams that want security findings arriving in the pull request with a fix attached.

Organisations with many web applications and no capacity to triage scanner noise.