Snyk vs Veracode

From $25 per contributing developer/month (indicative, Team)

Quote on request

Priced per contributing developer. Enterprise agreements add reporting and governance and get expensive.

Enterprise annual subscriptions priced by application count and scan types.

Free plan with a monthly test allowance, generous enough for small projects.

No free tier.

Category standard

Snyk · since 2015

Widely used

Veracode · since 2006

• Reachability analysis dramatically cuts the noise from transitive dependency alerts.
• Automated fix pull requests make remediation a merge rather than a project.
• One vendor covers dependencies, code, containers and IaC.

• Binary scanning works on third-party and supplier software where source is unavailable.
• Policy engine and attestation reports satisfy regulated procurement directly.
• Managed service model suits organisations without a security engineering team.

• Per-developer pricing scales uncomfortably in large engineering organisations.
• SAST is less deep than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Still produces substantial alert volume on older codebases.

• Slow feedback compared with developer-first tools — poor fit for per-commit scanning.
• Expensive per application.
• Developer experience lags Snyk and Semgrep considerably.

Engineering teams that want security findings arriving in the pull request with a fix attached.

Regulated enterprises needing formal security attestation, including for supplier software.