Testmo vs Allure TestOps

From $99 per month (indicative, small team)

From $30 per user/month (indicative)

Team-based rather than strictly per-seat pricing at lower tiers, which suits teams where many people need read access.

Self-hosted and cloud options; the underlying Allure Report remains free open source.

21-day trial.

Free tier for small teams; Allure Report itself is open source.

Emerging

Testmo · since 2021

Established

Qameta Software · since 2019

• Exploratory session management is a genuine gap in most competing tools.
• Very fast interface, built for keyboard-driven work.
• Handles manual and automated results as first-class citizens.

• Best-in-class handling of automated results — live ingestion, history, flakiness tracking.
• Builds on Allure Report, which many teams already generate.
• Self-hosting available for regulated environments.

• Small vendor with a modest ecosystem.
• Fewer compliance and audit features for regulated industries.
• No free tier.

• Manual testing features are weaker than in manual-first tools.
• Requires an existing automation culture to deliver value.
• Smaller vendor and community.

Teams that do meaningful exploratory testing alongside scripted and automated tests.

Automation-heavy teams that want test management shaped around CI rather than manual cases.