Testsigma vs QA Wolf

From $349 per month (indicative, cloud pro)

Quote on request

Cloud plans priced by parallel runs and users; the self-hosted community edition is free but you operate it.

Annual service contracts. Substantially cheaper than hiring an in-house automation team, substantially more expensive than a tool licence.

Open-source community edition, self-hosted.

Established

Testsigma Inc. · since 2019

Emerging

QA Wolf · since 2019

• An open-source edition is unusual in the low-code segment and removes lock-in anxiety.
• Natural-language steps are readable by product owners.
• Web, mobile and API in one authoring model.

• Removes the maintenance burden entirely — no flaky-test triage on your side.
• You own the Playwright code, so leaving is possible.
• Coverage arrives in weeks rather than quarters.

• Natural-language authoring is only approximately natural; you still learn a grammar.
• Smaller community than the established low-code vendors, so troubleshooting is slower.
• The self-hosted edition trails the cloud on features.

• It is headcount, not software — the cost profile is completely different from a licence.
• External team needs deep product context to test meaningfully.
• Fast-moving products can outpace the feedback loop with an external author.

Teams that want low-code authoring but refuse to put their entire suite in a proprietary cloud.

Funded startups that need coverage now and have no QA hire in the plan.