Useberry vs User Interviews

From $67 per month (indicative)

From $45 per participant (indicative, general population)

Cheaper than Maze at comparable functionality; participant recruitment is separate.

Per-participant recruiting fee plus the incentive you choose. Specialist B2B professionals cost considerably more.

Free plan with limited tests and responses.

Free to manage your own participants; recruitment is pay-per-participant.

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

Widely used

User Interviews · since 2015

• Good value — most of Maze's capability at a lower price.
• Supports a wide range of prototype sources.
• Card sorting and tree testing included rather than sold separately.

• Solves recruiting, which is the actual bottleneck in most research programmes.
• Handles incentive payment and scheduling logistics, saving substantial coordinator time.
• Works with whatever session tooling you already use.

• Smaller company with a lighter integration ecosystem.
• No moderated research.
• Limited built-in panel.

• No testing or analysis features — it is recruitment only.
• Panel is strongest in North America.
• Costs mount quickly for specialist B2B roles.

Small teams that want prototype testing without enterprise pricing.

Teams whose research is blocked on finding and paying the right participants.