Useberry vs Userlytics

From $67 per month (indicative)

From $49 per participant (indicative, pay-as-you-go)

Cheaper than Maze at comparable functionality; participant recruitment is separate.

Pay-per-session pricing is unusual in this category and suits intermittent research.

Free plan with limited tests and responses.

Free trial with a small number of sessions.

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

Established

Userlytics · since 2009

• Good value — most of Maze's capability at a lower price.
• Supports a wide range of prototype sources.
• Card sorting and tree testing included rather than sold separately.

• Pay-as-you-go avoids an annual commitment for occasional studies.
• Both moderated and unmoderated in one platform.
• Genuinely international panel including many non-English markets.

• Smaller company with a lighter integration ecosystem.
• No moderated research.
• Limited built-in panel.

• Interface is less polished than the market leaders.
• Analysis tooling is basic compared to UserTesting.
• Panel quality varies by market.

Small teams that want prototype testing without enterprise pricing.

Teams that research a few times a quarter and cannot justify an annual platform contract.