Veracode vs Mend.io

Quote on request

Quote on request

Enterprise annual subscriptions priced by application count and scan types.

Quote-based enterprise pricing, typically per developer or per application.

No free tier.

Free tier for small teams on Mend's developer products.

Widely used

Veracode · since 2006

Widely used

Mend.io · since 2011

• Binary scanning works on third-party and supplier software where source is unavailable.
• Policy engine and attestation reports satisfy regulated procurement directly.
• Managed service model suits organisations without a security engineering team.

• Licence compliance reporting is the strongest in the category and often the reason legal approves a release.
• Reachability analysis reduces the transitive-dependency alert flood.
• Automated remediation pull requests.

• Slow feedback compared with developer-first tools — poor fit for per-commit scanning.
• Expensive per application.
• Developer experience lags Snyk and Semgrep considerably.

• SAST is weaker than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Enterprise pricing and sales process.
• Interface is dated in places.

Regulated enterprises needing formal security attestation, including for supplier software.

Enterprises where open-source licence compliance is as important as vulnerability management.