Veracode vs Snyk

Quote on request

From $25 per contributing developer/month (indicative, Team)

Enterprise annual subscriptions priced by application count and scan types.

Priced per contributing developer. Enterprise agreements add reporting and governance and get expensive.

No free tier.

Free plan with a monthly test allowance, generous enough for small projects.

Widely used

Veracode · since 2006

Category standard

Snyk · since 2015

• Binary scanning works on third-party and supplier software where source is unavailable.
• Policy engine and attestation reports satisfy regulated procurement directly.
• Managed service model suits organisations without a security engineering team.

• Reachability analysis dramatically cuts the noise from transitive dependency alerts.
• Automated fix pull requests make remediation a merge rather than a project.
• One vendor covers dependencies, code, containers and IaC.

• Slow feedback compared with developer-first tools — poor fit for per-commit scanning.
• Expensive per application.
• Developer experience lags Snyk and Semgrep considerably.

• Per-developer pricing scales uncomfortably in large engineering organisations.
• SAST is less deep than dedicated code-analysis vendors.
• Still produces substantial alert volume on older codebases.

Regulated enterprises needing formal security attestation, including for supplier software.

Engineering teams that want security findings arriving in the pull request with a fix attached.